|

What are the different styles of leadership?
Photograph: CIMA
|
Objectives:
-
To understand the main theories of leadership and their
implications for productivity
-
To understand the limitations of leadership theory
-
To understand how management can be flexible in its
approach to leadership styles
Leadership
It was once believed that certain character types made
great leaders and that people were born with these characteristics. This is
called "trait theory". History has proved that it is incredibly difficult to
identify one character type as being more successful at leadership than others.
Theorists moved on to study leaders' personalities and
their behaviour patterns. This is known as style theory, and argues that there
are three main styles of management:
-
Autocratic leadership
The leader issues orders to workers informing them of how a task is to be done.
Communication tends to be a one-way process from the leader to the workers.
Workers are not involved in the decision making. Studies have shown that
productivity is highest under this leadership style while the manager is
present, but once the manager is not present productivity slumps
-
Democratic leadership
The leader consults with the group before making decisions. Communication is
two way with workers and the leader listening to each others' opinions. Workers
are consulted on all key decisions. Studies have shown that productivity is
high - not as high as in an autocratic situation, but when the leader is absent
the productivity does not drop
-
Laissez-faire leadership
The leader does little to interfere in the group. Group members are not
supported by the leader who largely acts like any other member of the group.
Communication is poor in both directions. This has the lowest level of
productivity of all styles of leadership
Leadership styles have been extensively researched, and few
solid conclusions have been reached. What is clear is that the style a leader
adopts depends on their perception of workers' motivation: do workers need to
be driven autocratically and motivated by pay or are workers more motivated by
being involved in decision making?
A leadership style's success depends on the circumstances
the leader is in. A crisis is often better managed using an autocratic style
of leadership and lots of short term part-time workers might function better
under an autocratic leadership style, but a team of colleagues who expect to
work together for the next ten years would probably be far more motivated by
being involved in decision making.
Leadership styles can affect employee motivation.
Therefore, managers need to be trained to adjust their leadership style to suit
the situation that they are working in.
|